Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive   more...and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUESpart D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people :in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.
In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on, no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.
There is no such thing as 'the perfect crime'.  less

Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple layering techniques and softwares were employed to simulate   more..."airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks aired manipulated images live on 9/11. The subsequent so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

"20TH CENTURY BOX"
This is the analysis of the forgeries shown on the "dumb-box" on 9/11. Manhattan was simulated digitally   more...( with various techniques) in order to
control the scenery which, in reality, featured missiles striking the twin towers.
  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

" EPILOGUE "
The 5 Most Frequently Asked Questions regarding the No Planes/TV Fakery issue.
This concludes the September Clues series.   more...I hope it has been a useful effort.
Would you like a conclusion to draw from all this ? I've said it before, and here it is again : switch off the television. Forever. The most peaceful revolution you could think of...
Of course, this doesn't mean I wouldn't like to see the authors of these heinous crimes behind bars. If enough people understand what they've been up to, we might just spur a new, shiny era for our beloved planet.
ADDENDUM :
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for almost 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organized this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media,
the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part4. As for the second "plane", most witnesses on the street
reported 'a SMALL AIRCRAFT' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again.
Only about 36 videos exist depicting a large airplane silhouette impacting the towers. All of them are, by now, proven fakes. Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body aluminum airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of this total video forgery (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : no one is going to prove HOW the towers fell or that a Norad standdown WAS ordered. This is what the perpetrators are counting on .
I am an audio-video professional who has spent many years researching 9/11, only to realize in early 2007 that I could contribute actively to the authentic truth search with my video-editing and audio processing skills.
  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. The layering techniques and softwares used for these simulations   more...seemingly blended real and digital images - but the EXACT way this was done is frankly not for us to define. However, the technology certainly exists and it is naive to think this was difficult/impossible to achieve.
In "CHOPPED OUT", I compare two shots - 11 minutes apart - both of them showing a reversing helicopter in the same corner of the screen and over very much the same spot of Manhattan. Additionally, both camera shots 'catch' the chopper at the end of a wide zoom out action.
The odds of all these similarities occuring in two distinct shots, 11 min apart in time are pretty close to nil. If you still believe it may be a "coincidence", I will let you believe this and you will have 'wasted' only 4 minutes of your life.
  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

This refined version of 911 AMATEUR part3 was - ironically - inspired by the so-called "debunkers" of my research. As it became clear   more...that what reflects Evan Fairbanks's "airplane" is indeed a car windshield, we have the ultimate proof Evan's shot is 100% fake.
The ineptitude of the "911 video forgery team" is thus established. It may be difficult to take in that such incompetence could go unnoticed in such a well-funded military operation - but this is what we have and what emerges from the close scrutiny of their wretched false-flag operation.
  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

It is now a proven fact that we were shown doctored images on TV on 9/11.
The SEPTEMBER CLUES video series (part1-9+EPILOGUE) is a 100min analysis   more...of all the inconsistencies of the broadcasts aired on that sad, fateful day.
"NOSED OUT" is a trailer of sorts to SEPTEMBER CLUES. It demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that the FOX live shot showing "Flight175" hitting WTC2 is a computer generated forgery.
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for almost 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media,
the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part4. As for the second "plane", most witnesses on the street
reported 'a SMALL AIRCRAFT' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again.
Only about 36 videos exist depicting an airplane silhouette impacting the towers. All of them are, by now, proven fakes. Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body aluminum airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of this total video forgery (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : no one is going to prove HOW the towers fell or that a Norad standdown WAS ordered. This is what the perpetrators are counting on .
I am an audio-video professional who has spent many years researching 9/11, only to realize in early 2007 that I could contribute actively to the authentic truth search with my video-editing and audio processing skills.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

The analysis of the Naudet brother's 1st strike footage.
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your   more...best choice.
The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible (i.e. not covered by 1st explosion dust) right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for as long as 5SECONDS after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember. As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1.
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (if anything at all - yet a missile's still likely) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES). On a final note, if this most publicized and widespread 9/11 video has been THIS sloppily forged, it appears there were whistleblowers within the forgery crew - or else that crew was quite simply an incompetent bunch.
In my honest opinion, the plane/no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

I have re-uploaded PART 2 as the original does'nt seem to always play.
If you still have problems starting it, watch it here :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2ifUT7B29Y
  more...Will upload a third version of part2 if all else fails.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

This critical analysis of FOX TV's 9/11 official archived broadcasts provides tangible proof of mass media complicity in the most vicious hoax   more...ever played upon mankind.
It appears FOX TV has simply scrapped their original 9/11 footage as it contained too many "howlers". As a replacement, they have re-cut from scratch their 9/11 footage with bits and pieces which were originally broadcast on all 4 rival TV networks : CNN,ABC,CBS and NBC.
In doing so, they have left most of the original audio track intact - thereby making for absurd image-vs-audio inconsistencies.
In addition, it appears most of all the 5 major networks' 9/11 morning footage (almost entirely consisting of static shots of the smoking towers) were composed using some yet-to-be-identified digital imagery devised to project fake views of Manhattan and - of course - fake planes melting into the twin towers. I wish good luck to any so-called "debunkers" of these findings.
It is now essential for all people of good reason to realize the mainstream mass media is totally and unconditionally devoted to government agendas and does not merit an ounce of public trust. Television is the most lethal "weapon of mind destruction" : the most peaceful and effective revolution would be to simply SWITCH IT OFF - for your children's and your own safety - FOREVER. That is the only solution I can see to this madness.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

IT'S CASE CLOSED FOR 9/11 TV FAKERY : THE TV NETWORKS FAKED EVERYTHING - AND THE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE CANNOT BE DISMISSED OFFHAND IN A (LEGITIMATE)   more...COURT OF LAW.
This critical analysis of FOX TV's 9/11 official archived broadcasts provides tangible proof of mass media complicity in the most vicious hoax ever played upon mankind.
It appears FOX TV has simply scrapped their original 9/11 footage as it contained too many "howlers". As a replacement, they have re-cut from scratch their 9/11 footage with bits and pieces which were originally broadcast on all 4 rival TV networks : CNN,ABC,CBS and NBC.
In doing so, they have left most of the original audio track intact - thereby making for absurd image-vs-audio inconsistencies.
In addition, it appears most of all the 5 major networks' 9/11 morning footage (almost entirely consisting of static shots of the smoking towers) were composed using some yet-to-be-identified digital imagery devised to project fake views of Manhattan and - of course - fake planes melting into the twin towers. I wish good luck to any so-called "debunkers" of these findings.
It is now essential for all people of good reason to realize the mainstream mass media is totally and unconditionally devoted to government agendas and does not merit an ounce of public trust. Television is the most lethal "weapon of mind destruction" : the most peaceful and effective revolution would be to simply SWITCH IT OFF - for your children's and your own safety - FOREVER. That is the only solution I can see to this madness.  less

"You have no right to tell me,
time...isn't running out".


music & lyrics by : The Social Service / Simon Shack

"I may be crazy but I'm not a fool..."

music & lyrics by The Social Service / Simon Shack


...in a World crowded by fools, why not just stay crazy?

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

(Part 8 of 8) :
" SYNCHRONICITY "
( just click on my user name "socialservice" to access all other SEPTEMBER CLUES parts )

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

(Part 7of 8) :
" PANDEMONIUM "
( just click on my user name "socialservice" to access all other SEPTEMBER CLUES parts )

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

(Part 6of 8) :
" FORGERIES INC."
( just click on my user name "socialservice" to access all other SEPTEMBER CLUES parts )

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

(Part 5of 8) :
"17 SECONDS"
( just click on my user name "socialservice" to access all other SEPTEMBER CLUES parts )

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

(Part 2of 8) :
"THE FLYING TELEPHANTS"
( just click on my user name "socialservice" to access all other SEPTEMBER CLUES parts   more...)  less